Readers will know that I'm 
predisposed to write about musical instruments, so I want to share a few
 thoughts that draw trends in consumer 
culture by looking at a product category that I like
In this case, synthesisers.
There are three broad ideas to identify: cloud-based products, cheap knock-offs and declining quality among established brands.
The first concerns those subscription-based services one can access online and you might be surprised that synthesisers are a thing to rent in your internet browser.
My favourite recent commentator 
about synthesisers is Florian Pilz and he says that cloud instruments 
are a bad idea, so that's good enough for me because I love buying good 
musical gear.
A benefit of having physical hardware is having something to sell when the good gear is not as good as you hoped it to be.
It's
 getting harder to find the good stuff among all the Bad Gear that 
Florian reviews among the jokes he doesn't make about Uli Behringer, 
whose company has been making cheap versions of classic and contemporary
 synthesisers and drum machines.
Behringer is 
notoriously litigious but has been successful in making new models of 
popular secondhand gear, some of which is stuff like the synths that a 
company like Roland rents in their cloud subscription.
For
 many consumers Behringer is the answer to the question why Roland 
aren't selling versions of the classic TR-909 and TB-303 machines.
Critics have quoted the weirdly translated words of 
Roland's CEO that the company "doesn't chase ghosts" as a way of 
explaining that they've moved on, but others point out that the engineers who designed analogue intruments have probably all retired. 
I
 have Roland's "Boutique" range and also Behringer's colourful copies of
 these XOX-boxes that gave rise to genres like Acid and Techno, as well 
as all the subgenres that emerged under them.
Given
 how those musical styles developed beyond the scope of Roland imagining
 these little machines to play basslines and drums, it shouldn't be a 
surprise that the company hasn't been able to read the marketplace.
It's said that the 909 drum machine was discontinued before it found a role in the rave revolution.
However, what surprises me is how often I reach for the Behringer models, despite them being cheaper and sounding rougher.
So
 I think Behringer is providing a great service for people who want to 
make electronic music and who doesn't? I think it was Uwe Schmidt who 
described techno as modern folk music.
One 
of the key observations that Pilz makes in the Bad Gear episode above is
 that Roland probably doesn't care too much about these products.
He
 estimates they might be less than 10% of Roland's business, but it was 
Florian's comparison with Nestle that really drove home an analogy for 
those who aren't analogue synth lovers.
This showed Roland's synths and drum machines are about as significant to their corporate reporting as chocolate is to Nestle.
The
 company that makes Cadbury is clearly making a different product to the
 confectionery that I ate in previous decades, which goes some way to 
explain why I still have my TR-707 as it hasn't had a reissue or 
imitation yet.
In conclusion I realise the 
declining brands are a factor in the decision of Roland to make software
 imitations for the cloud and watch as other companies make the products
 that consumers want to buy.
It leads me to wonder what other celebrated brands are letting their legacy and IP go to waste?



