Synthetic synthesisers

Readers will know that I'm predisposed to write about musical instruments, so I want to share a few thoughts that draw trends in consumer culture by looking at a product category that I like

In this case, synthesisers.

There are three broad ideas to identify: cloud-based products, cheap knock-offs and declining quality among established brands.

The first concerns those subscription-based services one can access online and you might be surprised that synthesisers are a thing to rent in your internet browser.

My favourite recent commentator about synthesisers is Florian Pilz and he says that cloud instruments are a bad idea, so that's good enough for me because I love buying good musical gear.
 


A benefit of having physical hardware is having something to sell when the good gear is not as good as you hoped it to be.

It's getting harder to find the good stuff among all the Bad Gear that Florian reviews among the jokes he doesn't make about Uli Behringer, whose company has been making cheap versions of classic and contemporary synthesisers and drum machines.

Behringer is notoriously litigious but has been successful in making new models of popular secondhand gear, some of which is stuff like the synths that a company like Roland rents in their cloud subscription.

For many consumers Behringer is the answer to the question why Roland aren't selling versions of the classic TR-909 and TB-303 machines.
 
Critics have quoted the weirdly translated words of Roland's CEO that the company "doesn't chase ghosts" as a way of explaining that they've moved on, but others point out that the engineers who designed analogue intruments have probably all retired.

I have Roland's "Boutique" range and also Behringer's colourful copies of these XOX-boxes that gave rise to genres like Acid and Techno, as well as all the subgenres that emerged under them.

Given how those musical styles developed beyond the scope of Roland imagining these little machines to play basslines and drums, it shouldn't be a surprise that the company hasn't been able to read the marketplace.

It's said that the 909 drum machine was discontinued before it found a role in the rave revolution.

However, what surprises me is how often I reach for the Behringer models, despite them being cheaper and sounding rougher.

So I think Behringer is providing a great service for people who want to make electronic music and who doesn't? I think it was Uwe Schmidt who described techno as modern folk music.

One of the key observations that Pilz makes in the Bad Gear episode above is that Roland probably doesn't care too much about these products.

He estimates they might be less than 10% of Roland's business, but it was Florian's comparison with Nestle that really drove home an analogy for those who aren't analogue synth lovers.

This showed Roland's synths and drum machines are about as significant to their corporate reporting as chocolate is to Nestle.

The company that makes Cadbury is clearly making a different product to the confectionery that I ate in previous decades, which goes some way to explain why I still have my TR-707 as it hasn't had a reissue or imitation yet.

In conclusion I realise the declining brands are a factor in the decision of Roland to make software imitations for the cloud and watch as other companies make the products that consumers want to buy.

It leads me to wonder what other celebrated brands are letting their legacy and IP go to waste?

The desire is strong to have those celebrated sounds in one's home studio, although perhaps it's better for musical innovation if one has to search further afield for the potency they once showed.